CEFR Can-Do Statements: How to Use Them for Self-Assessment
Quick Answer: CEFR can-do statements are the short "I can" sentences that define each proficiency level, from introducing yourself at A1 to presenting complex subjects at C1. They are the framework's most practical tool: they let you check your level honestly, set precise goals and prepare properly for a placement test.
A CEFR can-do statement is an "I can" descriptor sentence that defines one communicative task a learner can perform reliably in real situations at a given level of the Common European Framework of Reference. The six levels, A1 to C2, are built from such statements rather than grammar lists or vocabulary counts, which is why the system works across languages, countries and courses.
This guide explains where the statements come from, how to read the word "can" correctly, how to use the system for honest self-assessment and goal setting, and where self-assessment stops being reliable.
Where Can-Do Statements Come From

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, published by the Council of Europe in 2001, was designed as a shared scale for describing language ability. Instead of ranking learners by curriculum or hours studied, it describes ability through descriptor sentences: concrete tasks a person can perform with language.
Those descriptors are collected into the CEFR self-assessment grid, with rows for each skill and columns for the six levels grouped into three bands: Basic User at A1 and A2, Independent User at B1 and B2, and Proficient User at C1 and C2. Schools, exam boards and employers worldwide, including language schools in Singapore, use this grid to describe courses, set entry requirements and place learners.
What the Word "Can" Really Means
One reading rule separates useful self-assessment from wishful thinking: "can" means reliably, in real situations, without unusual support. It does not mean you managed the task once, with preparation, in a good mood, with a patient listener. The statement describes your normal performance, not your best day.
Notice also that most statements carry qualifiers, such as "in simple terms", "straightforward" or "with ease", and the qualifiers carry as much meaning as the verb. "I can describe my work" is an A2 statement only when the description stays in simple, connected terms. Read every sentence in full, because the boundary between levels usually lives in the qualifier, not the task itself.
Example Statements at Each Level
The table below paraphrases one illustrative speaking-related statement per level, to show how the wording scales from basic survival to full command. Each level is defined by dozens of such statements across listening, reading, spoken interaction, spoken production and writing.
| Level | Illustrative statement (paraphrased) | What it signals |
|---|---|---|
| A1 | "I can introduce myself and ask and answer simple questions about where I live and people I know." | Survival basics using rehearsed phrases |
| A2 | "I can describe my work and background in simple terms." | Simple connected sentences on familiar topics |
| B1 | "I can describe experiences and events and give brief reasons for my opinions." | Independent coping in everyday situations |
| B2 | "I can explain my viewpoint on an issue, giving advantages and disadvantages." | Spontaneous interaction without strain |
| C1 | "I can present clear, detailed descriptions of complex subjects." | Flexible, precise use in professional life |
| C2 | "I can summarise and reconstruct complex information from different sources." | Full command across contexts |
These are paraphrases for readability; the official grid is published by the Council of Europe and reproduced by major exam boards. The pattern to notice is that levels scale on independence, precision and complexity of tasks, not on accent or speed.
Self-Assessing Honestly Before a Placement Test
Working through the grid before a placement test has two benefits: you arrive with realistic expectations, and you can compare your own judgement against the school's assessment afterwards, which is itself informative. Four steps keep the process honest.
- Work one skill at a time, starting with reading or listening, where self-judgement is most stable, before tackling speaking.
- Mark each statement yes, with difficulty, or not yet, and resist collapsing the honest middle option into yes; most overestimation happens exactly there.
- Find the border where solid yes answers collapse into a mixture; your working level is the last mostly-yes column, not the highest statement you can claim once.
- Repeat separately for speaking and writing, because profiles are rarely flat across skills, and the gaps are precisely what a placement discussion needs to know.
Bring the completed grid to your enrolment conversation. A school that uses CEFR-based placement will use it as a starting hypothesis and confirm it with live assessment tasks.
Turning Statements Into Personal Learning Goals
Vague goals such as "improve my English" fail because progress cannot be checked. Can-do statements convert levels into observable behaviours, and behaviours can be practised and ticked off. This is the system's second practical use beyond assessment.
The method is to borrow the next level's statements as training tasks. If your working level is B1 and the B2 statement says you can explain a viewpoint with advantages and disadvantages, your weekly task becomes recording a two-minute opinion with two supporting reasons and one counter-argument. When you can perform that task unprompted across several topics, the statement, and effectively the sub-level, is yours. Goals built this way are self-grading, which keeps motivation anchored to evidence.
The Limits of Self-Assessment
Self-assessment using can-do statements is directionally useful but systematically generous, and the gap is largest for speaking. Understanding a statement feels like being able to perform it, yet recognition and production are different abilities; most learners also unconsciously compare themselves to their best single attempt rather than their typical week.
The practical fix is to treat self-assessment as a hypothesis, never a verdict. Confirm it with a teacher's live judgement or a placement assessment, ideally one that includes actual speaking and writing tasks rather than only a multiple-choice test. iWorld Learning is a Singapore-based English language school that places adult learners through CEFR-based assessment combining self-report with live teacher evaluation, so the level recorded is the level a learner can actually perform; you can read more about how assessment supports placement on its site.
FAQ
What are CEFR can-do statements used for?
They define level boundaries, support placement decisions and give learners a concrete vocabulary for goals. Schools use them to describe courses and group learners, exam boards use them to anchor test grades, and learners use them to check level and set targets. Because they describe tasks rather than grammar points, they mean the same thing in every country and language.
How do I use the CEFR self-assessment grid?
Choose one skill, read the statements from A1 upwards, and mark each one yes, with difficulty, or not yet. Your level is the last column where most statements are a solid yes, not the highest statement you can claim once. Assess speaking and writing separately from reading and listening, since gaps between skills are normal and placement depends on them.
Is CEFR self-assessment accurate?
Partly. Most learners place themselves slightly high, especially for speaking, because understanding a statement feels like being able to perform it. Accuracy improves when you read qualifiers carefully, assess one skill at a time, and treat the result as a hypothesis to confirm through a teacher's assessment or a placement test rather than a final verdict.
Can I move up a level by practising the next level's statements?
Largely yes; that is the point of the system. Statements convert a level into a list of practisable tasks, so targeting the next level's descriptors gives you precise training goals. The caveat is reliability: a statement counts only when you can perform it unprompted across situations, not when you have rehearsed one example successfully.
Do language schools in Singapore use CEFR levels?
Many do, especially private language schools teaching adults, because CEFR provides a shared scale for placement and course descriptions. When choosing a school, ask whether placement includes a live speaking and writing check rather than only a written test, since the full picture of your level often differs from what a written test alone shows.
Summary
Can-do statements turn the CEFR from a set of labels into a working tool. Read "can" as reliably in real situations, respect the qualifiers, self-assess one skill at a time and locate your level at the border where confidence collapses, then borrow the next level's statements as practisable goals. Confirm your estimate with a live assessment before committing to a course; if you would like yours checked, you can arrange a placement consultation with iWorld Learning's adult course team, and browse the course overview to see how levels map to classes.